Upcoming Investments

Victoria’s three strikes landlord proposal would make life harder for renters


key takeaways

Key takeaways

The Victorian Greens have proposed landlord licensing and a three-strikes system. This is a political proposal, not an existing requirement for ordinary residential landlords.

Serious and repeated failures to provide safe housing deserve consequences, with clear rules and a fair review process.

If additional uncertainty discourages rental investment, it could reduce choice for tenants and put upward pressure on rents.

Any licensing scheme must explain how existing tenants would be protected if their landlord lost the right to lease.


Victorian landlords could be required to hold a licence and face a three-strike rule that would strip them of their right to rent out properties under a Greens proposal unveiled ahead of the upcoming state election.

While the plan aims to hold landlords accountable for breaching their obligations, this ridiculous proposal would add another layer of uncertainty for property investors and worsen Melbourne’s rental pressures.

Tenants deserve safe, well-maintained homes, but any policy that discourages responsible investors from providing rental accommodation risks leaving those tenants with fewer choices and higher rents.

For Rent Victoria

What is being proposed?

The Victorian Greens say landlords should have to hold licences in order to rent out properties in their latest election pledge.

Greens spokesperson for renters’ rights Gabrielle De Vietri told Charlie Pickering the policy would protect renters from “substandard housing” but, when asked by the media, could not answer how this would impact housing supply in Victoria.

“Landlords have power over their tenants, and they should prove they are responsible,” Ms de Vietri said. “If you can’t provide a safe home then you shouldn’t be a landlord.”

The licence would operate under a three-strike process, under which landlords could lose their right to lease if they breach renters’ rights multiple times.

Its responsibilities would also include rent-worthiness checks, energy-efficiency disclosures for advertised leases, independent inspections and penalties for failures to meet minimum standards or carry out repairs.

The Greens estimate that $50 million would be needed to establish the regulator and oversee the licensing system alongside their other proposed rental reforms.

Greens spokesperson for renters Gabrielle de Vietri summed up the party’s position: “If you can’t provide a safe home then you shouldn’t be a landlord.”

I agree that providing a safe home is a basic responsibility of property ownership. My concern is how a licensing system would operate and whether its consequences would extend to tenants and responsible investors.

The report places licensing within a broader Greens package that also includes a rent freeze and rent caps.

In my view, the Greens have consistently taken an adversarial approach to private property investors, yet their proposals have failed to explain how sufficient alternative rental accommodation would be delivered if those investors withdrew.

Until they can demonstrate a practical replacement at the required scale, discouraging the people who provide rental homes would only make life harder for tenants – the very people they profess to be protecting.

The details will matter

A three-strikes slogan is easy to say and may sound politically appealing to some, but a workable policy needs to distinguish between the seriousness of different breaches.

Repeatedly ignoring a dangerous electrical fault warrants a very different response from a record keeping error that is promptly corrected.

Any scheme would need clear definitions of a strike, an independent process for determining a breach, appropriate appeal rights, and rules on how long strikes remain on a landlord’s record.

It would also need to distinguish a complaint from a proven breach, and explain whether several issues arising from one incident could count as multiple strikes.

Those safeguards would help tenants understand their rights and give responsible landlords confidence about their obligations.

The proposed rent-worthiness checks would also need clear criteria and a practical inspection process, including an explanation of how they would interact with existing minimum standards and safety checks.

Most importantly, the policy needs a practical answer for tenants whose landlord loses a licence. Their housing security should be central to its design.



Source link

Leave a Response