This 2-ETF Portfolio Protects You From a Stock Market Storm and Teaches You the Most Important Investing Lesson Ever

Here’s the very first thing any newer investor should not just know, but truly understand, consider, and personalize, if they want to be successful.
Markets are cyclical. More than anything else.
More News from Barchart
How cyclical? When I was first learning about markets, circa 1980 something, they taught us that major stock market cycles (bull and bear) tend to last about 16 years each.
Here is a chart of the S&P 500 Index ($SPX) starting Jan. 1, 2000. I could have started at the March peak that year, but I wanted to keep the dates clean. The chart goes through Jan. 1, 2013. So 13 years. How much did the S&P 500 average per year? During that time? About ZERO PERCENT.
More importantly, look at the path it took, starting at a time that reminds me of this very era, the dot-com bubble. How much of that 13-year period was the S&P 500 making “new highs” versus that peak in 2000? Virtually none of it. That’s what a tech bubble, financial crisis, and recovery over 13 years will do… and it’s terrible.
Because it is not just “I started with $100 and 13 years later it is still $100.” It is the impact of inflation, and the tremendous lost opportunity. There’s more to investing than buy-and-hold stock and equity ETF strategies.
If you only remember three things about stock market investing, let it be these: Cyclical, Cyclical, Cyclical! That’s why I’ve been a technician for 40+ years. I think it is where the markets tell their story. Not only over short time frames, but over very long ones too.
Now, let’s check out the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ). After all, the S&P 500 is the “diversified index,” right? Well, not like it used to be. It is crowded into a relatively small number of stocks, with about 25 of them determining what index-tracking ETFs do. The other 475 companies don’t matter much to the full index.
Why is that a problem? It isn’t, until the tide turns. If and when it does… it’s a big problem. The consequence is losing a decade or two (such as between 1929-1954).
Here’s QQQ. With all those next-gen growth stocks and world-changers.
So, did QQQ make up for the lost time that investors had with SPY and similar ETFs? No. It added time to the misery! 16 years of nothing. Except in this case, the decline was more than 80%, and it was faster. Then, once it bottomed in March 2003 (I remember it well!), it continued to be somewhat of a “bottom feeder.” That’s what I call it when an ETF like QQQ goes from over $100 a share to under $20, then rises to $40 but then declines toward the previous lows again. Look at early 2012 in that chart above. QQQ reached $50. Up from $20 at the low, great! But still half its value from back when times were happy for stock investors.



